- CANON MACRO LENS 5X HOW TO
- CANON MACRO LENS 5X MANUAL
- CANON MACRO LENS 5X FULL
- CANON MACRO LENS 5X FREE
Next move, to buy a Focus Stacker Rail, a lots of money, but worth it big time.
CANON MACRO LENS 5X MANUAL
The nanoha is quircky to say the least, still haven't got a decent macro from it.ĭoing the stacking at those magnifications proved frustrating using a manual rail, I I am still not convinced on the optical quality of the Nanoha lens. Then said, I will buy the Nanoha and use it with my Olympus EM5 which is my travel camera. Pretty good, but a pain, but wanted more magnification.
CANON MACRO LENS 5X FULL
with extension tubes, the problem is that the lengths of the tubes and the weight of the lenses, made false contacts, but hey in full manual, who cares. After trying and doing it all, I ended up buying the MP65, and as much as I did not wanted to buy a canon camera, I ended up buying the super small Rebel SL1. Nikon has great macro lenses, but the versatility of the MP65 is just fantastic. I read this thread and said, been there done that. Zeiss Luminars and the Macro Nikkors outresolves the MP-E 65 mm by approx. In addition the images quality is much better, than the MP-E 65 mm.
CANON MACRO LENS 5X FREE
3-4 cm this is very big and leaves you free space for your lightning. Compared to the the MP-E 65 5:1 with approx. The Zeiss Luminar 63 mm (a good choice for magnification in the range of up to 5x) has a free working distance of more than 63 mm (at all magnifications). Although this looks in the first instance not very easy to use, you will fastly find the benefits of this setup:Īs these setups use standard focsuing methods (unless most of the available normal lenses) the free working distance will always be bigger than the focal lens. This lenses are used together with bellows.
The best way to achieve high magnifications with a reasonable free working distance ist the use of "true" macro lenses like the Macro Nikkors or Zeiss Luminars. Let's exclude all tinker solutions like reversing al lens et cetera, as the image quality is only in a similar range (or worse) as the MP-E 65. In addition its image quality is not that good, although it manages many circumstances quite well, if you use the lens only one f-stop stopped down.įor Nikon and of course all other systems there are much better solutions available. It's so small, that the shooting of living subjects is relatively limited. The drawback is its free working distance, which is extreme small. The MP-E 65 is a nice lens, while it share the drawbacks of all current macro lenses: It reduces its focal lens, to achieve a reasonable magnification with a "managable" extension. This image was either done with a special microscope with an extreme high DOF (some Olympus Microscopes have such characteristics) or it is (most likely) a deep focus fusion image. So what you show us here is NOT a single shot. Your question is a good one, while the posted photo is not the best example.
CANON MACRO LENS 5X HOW TO
Its a bit big and I have not found out how to best use it yet.
I have one, but I have not tried it much yet. And for small appertures you need lots of light I am still looking for a better way to light these kind of macros.įor even bigger magnification macros, you can use bellows and reverse lenses on them. Nikon af 50mm f1.8 reversed in front of a Sigma 55-200mm lense.(You use a ring callled a macro coupler, wich make you able to mount the 50mm with the fiilter ring against the filter ring of the 55-200mm):ĭepth of field is very thin, so you need to use small appertures to get any depth of field at all. Nikon E 28mm f2.8 reversed on a PK-13 extension tube (You mount the PK-13 extension tube on the camera, and reverse mount the 28mm on the tube with a br2a reversing ring): I have tried reversing and stacking lenses to get bigger magnification, and now use two types set-ups to get me around 4:1: As earlier mentioned, there are different ways to get bigger tha 1:1 magnification with nikon, but not with one macro lense like canon.
0 kommentar(er)
